Abstract

In this paper, we elaborate an Institutional Analysis and Reconfiguration Framework centered around the ‘action arena’ theoretical approach. We develop this framework to analyze institutional reconfiguration to enhance sustainability, and operationalize it using research methods which focus on documentation of the institutional contexts through an extensive literature review and interviews of experts in forest policy. We apply the Institutional Analysis and Reconfiguration Framework to examine forestry institutions, address forest governance, and investigate their effect on socio-economic and environmental performances in forestry of Ukraine. The paper draws on the state of affairs in post-transition forestry, its difficulties, and new prospects for economic and institutional reforms. We examine challenges and opportunities in forestry and suggest key remedies and prospective ways forward. Results show that a combination of path dependency with the rigidity of institutions and a slow pace of economic and political reforms is the major obstacle to implementing decisions regarding sustainable forest policy. A reconfiguration of social practices is required, as well as the development of capabilities and awareness raising amongst relevant stakeholders, to realize the problems, envision alternative futures, challenge existing institutions, shift power relations and create new norms, rules, and decision-making arrangements. The way towards sustainability in forestry largely goes through changing institutions, and a human dimension of institutional changes reflected in the uptake of social innovation.

Highlights

  • The understanding of the roles of forestry in a bioeconomy emerged as a follow-up, with the bioeconomy seen as a catalyst for systemic change to tackle the social, economic and environmental aspects of sustainability holistically, which is not yet addressed coherently [7]

  • The results show that, generally, pro-environmental legislation may not result in sustainable forestry, amongst the reasons for which is a mismatch between sustainability concerns and forestry institutions

  • The theoretical novelty presented in this paper concerns adapting in the context of a post-transition country of the action arena concept of institutional changes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The understanding of the roles of forestry in a bioeconomy emerged as a follow-up, with the bioeconomy seen as a catalyst for systemic change to tackle the social, economic and environmental aspects of sustainability holistically, which is not yet addressed coherently [7] This observation and meeting the economic criterion of sustainability is deemed to be important in post-transition countries. By bringing in conceptual and empirical evidence from Ukraine, our purpose is to fill the knowledge gap associated with the operationalization of institutions and practical implications for changing social practices in forestry of a post-transition country. The results show that a combination of path dependency with the rigidity of institutions and a slow pace of economic and political reforms are major obstacles to implementing sustainable forest policy decisions

Background on Forestry in Ukraine
Management
Theories of Institutions
An Institutional Analysis and Reconfiguration Framework
Using the Framework to Examine the Reconfiguration
Literature
Institutional Environment
Actors in the Action Arena
Further Sustainability Considerations
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call