Abstract

The calibration of models for urban drainage systems has become more and more important as especially the usage of detailed models has increased considerably over the last years as the basis for planning and design. Still the effects originating from the choice of data used for model calibration are little known and advice on planning measurement campaigns for model calibration is limited, especially for small and medium-sized municipalities. The choice of measurement sites (number and location) within a sewer system is affecting the robustness of the calibration and in consequence the assessment of the modelled system behaviour. This paper discusses the calibration of a hydrologic-hydrodynamic model using the representative example of a small municipality. Different calibration scenarios were created using a model-based approach, focusing on varying availability of in-sewer measurement data. To assess the performance of different scenarios and validate the respective models, different model outputs were compared. The different calibration scenarios resulted in high variations in the model performances. The number and location of used calibration points influence model performance significantly. Predicted CSO volumes deviate from a set of given reference values in ranges between 1% and 253% for one, −21% to −5% for two and 1% to 237% for five used calibration points, depending on the rainfall data input. Consequently, the design of measurement campaigns for calibration data is a very sensitive decision in the modelling process. The model performance further influences design and decision-making processes, which are then perceptible in economic and functional aspects.

Highlights

  • The usage of hydrodynamic models, for flood forecasting and as a planning tool in urban drainage has increased considerably over the last decades and with it the importance of understanding a model’s ability to reproduce the system behaviour

  • Even for different rainfall inputs and neglecting spatial distributions of occurring intensities, their validations resulted in very good agreements and low deviations from the used reference scenario when looking at the combined sewer overflows (CSO) volumes

  • For design storms with return periods of 5 and 10 years, it shows higher possible deviation ranges for flooding than for CSO volumes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The usage of hydrodynamic models, for flood forecasting and as a planning tool in urban drainage has increased considerably over the last decades and with it the importance of understanding a model’s ability to reproduce the system behaviour. They stem of measurement errors for both input and calibration data, the selection of appropriate calibration and validation datasets, the applied calibration algorithms and the objective functions used during the calibration process (Deletic et al 2012) Another possible deficit of urban water management studies is that the case studies in scientific literature are often the same, usually larger cities which have the financial and human resources to participate in research projects and to provide an appropriate data-background (i.e. Los Angeles in Barco et al (2008), Melbourne in Bach et al (2013) or Shenzen in Gong et al (2017)). The influence of data availability on calibration performance is investigated for the hydrodynamic drainage model of a small Austrian municipality For this purpose, different scenarios of data availability for calibration are simulated. This paper describes three scenarios (scenario I, II and III – varying in amount and distribution of measurement sites) to highlight the influences originating from the design of in-sewer measurement campaigns

Methods
Case Study
Calibration Procedure
Model Validation and Evaluation
Results and Discussion
Performance of Calibrated Models
Uncertainties Due to a Spatial Difference in Calibration Data Availability
Sensitivity Analysis for Scenario II
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.