Abstract

This commentary describes how context, quality, and efficiency guide data curation at the University of Michigan's Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). These three principals manifest from necessity. A primary purpose of this work is to facilitate secondary data analysis but in order to so, the context of data must be documented. Since a mistake in this work would render any results published from the data inaccurate, quality is paramount. However, optimizing data quality can be time consuming, so automative curation practices are necessary for efficiency. The implementation of these principles (context, quality, and efficiency) is demonstrated by a recent case study with a high-profile dataset. As the nature of data work changes, these principles will continue to guide the practice of curation and establish valuable skills for future curators to cultivate.

Highlights

  • I curate data for the world’s largest social science data archive

  • At Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR), researchers and institutions affiliated with hundreds of universities entrust us with their data because our fastidious curation process increases the data’s value, posterity, and potential for discovery and citation

  • There is no room for error in data curation

Read more

Summary

Skylar Hawthorne University of Michigan

Let us know how access to this document benefits you. Follow this and additional works at: https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib Part of the Archival Science Commons, Cataloging and Metadata Commons, Scholarly. An Insider’s Take on Data Curation: Context, Quality, and Efficiency.

Introduction
Documenting Data Context
Assuring Data Quality
Efficiency in Curation
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call