Abstract

SummaryNon-invasive testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) is usually based on the exercise ECG alone or combined with thallium scintigraphy, while coronary angiography generally represents the final work-up.In this paper, we evaluate the relative merits of each diagnostic strategy in terms of its financial cost and of the reduction in diagnostic uncertainty. The uncertainty level before and after test is measured with the help of concepts used in information theory. The basic inputs of the program are:1) the prior probability of CAD (p) and of its severity, obtained from a large data bank (CADENZA);2) conditional probabilities of the presence and severity of CAD according to exercise ECG and thallium scintigraphy results obtained from the Louvain data bank; and3) the financial cost of each technique as well as society’s willingness to pay (WTP) for a reduction in diagnostic uncertainty.We present a graph showing the optimal strategy in terms of p and WTP. When information is sought only about the presence of CAD, arteriography is hardly ever the preferred test. However, once the severity of CAD also matters, it is the best procedure for values of p exceeding .75. Below this level, thallium scintigraphy is the most effective approach.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.