Abstract
He remarks [21 after deriving equation (2) that absence of the factor -c/j -x2 from the denominator is remarkable. This paper obtains an inequality for J,(vx) where the factor (1 -x2)1/4 does not appear. The region where it is a better upper bound than (1) is determined. The notation used is exactly that of Watson [21 and most of the derivation is exactly the same as used by Watson to derive (1).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
