Abstract
This article draws a distinction between the teaching of theories of legal argumentation, on the one hand, and practical legal reasoning and argumentation, on the other. While the theories of legal argumentation represent an analytical-conceptual reflection on the practice of reasoning in different contexts, legal reasoning and argumentation is a practical skill that is put into operation through the simulation of argumentative contexts. In this way, the teaching of legal reasoning and argumentation can be developed more effectively from an inductive methodology, in which from the simulation of realistic contexts of argumentation, guidelines are extracted for a better approach and defense of arguments.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
