Abstract

BackgroundThe reduced ability to identify a second target when it is presented in close temporal succession of a first target is called the attentional blink (AB). Studies have shown large individual differences in AB task performance, where lower task performance has been associated with more reversed order reports of both targets if these were presented in direct succession. In order to study the suggestion that reversed order reports reflect loss of temporal information, in the current study, we investigated whether individuals with a larger AB have a higher tendency to temporally integrate both targets into one visual event by using an AB paradigm containing symbol target stimuli.Methodology/Principal FindingsIndeed, we found a positive relation between the tendency to temporally integrate information and individual AB magnitude. In contrast to earlier work, we found no relation between order reversals and individual AB magnitude. The occurrence of temporal integration was negatively related to the number of order reversals, indicating that individuals either integrated or separated and reversed information.ConclusionWe conclude that individuals with better AB task performance use a shorter time window to integrate information, and therefore have higher preservation of temporal information. Furthermore, order reversals observed in paradigms with alphanumeric targets indeed seem to at least partially reflect temporal integration of both targets. Given the negative relation between temporal integration and ‘true’ order reversals observed with the current symbolic target set, these two behavioral outcomes seem to be two sides of the same coin.

Highlights

  • A tiny part of all available visual input can be perceived consciously

  • We conclude that individuals with better attentional blink (AB) task performance use a shorter time window to integrate information, and have higher preservation of temporal information

  • Rather than a structural bottleneck, the AB has been suggested to be the result of applying an attentional strategy that is suboptimal for the AB task [5,6,7,8], where evidence points to a role of the distribution of attention deployed to the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) stream of stimuli, and the first target in particular [5, 8,9,10,11,12,13,14]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The process of selection happens through allocation of attention to relevant information that is present in our surroundings This system of selective attention works relatively well in most situations, if two to-be-identified targets (T1 and T2) are presented in rapid temporal succession (200– 500 ms), identification of T2 frequently fails. According to the competing boost and bounce model, attentional selection functions as a filter that causes irrelevant information to be suppressed, while relevant information is boosted [15] Because these processes carry a slight time lag, in the AB task, T2 is accidentally suppressed, because the distractor following T1 was boosted. In order to study the suggestion that reversed order reports reflect loss of temporal information, in the current study, we investigated whether individuals with a larger AB have a higher tendency to temporally integrate both targets into one visual event by using an AB paradigm containing symbol target stimuli.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call