Abstract

Attack of plants by herbivorous arthropods may result in considerable changes to the plant’s chemical phenotype with respect to emission of herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs). These HIPVs have been shown to act as repellents to the attacking insects as well as attractants for the insects antagonistic to these herbivores. Plants can also respond to HIPV signals from other plants that warn them of impending attack. Recent investigations have shown that certain maize varieties are able to emit volatiles following stemborer egg deposition. These volatiles attract the herbivore’s parasitoids and directly deter further oviposition. However, it was not known whether these oviposition-induced maize (Zea mays, L.) volatiles can mediate chemical phenotypic changes in neighbouring unattacked maize plants. Therefore, this study sought to investigate the effect of oviposition-induced maize volatiles on intact neighbouring maize plants in ‘Nyamula’, a landrace known to respond to oviposition, and a standard commercial hybrid, HB515, that did not. Headspace volatile samples were collected from maize plants exposed to Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) egg deposition and unoviposited neighbouring plants as well as from control plants kept away from the volatile emitting ones. Behavioural bioassays were carried out in a four-arm olfactometer using egg (Trichogramma bournieri Pintureau & Babault (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)) and larval (Cotesia sesamiae Cameron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)) parasitoids. Coupled Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) was used for volatile analysis. For the ‘Nyamula’ landrace, GC-MS analysis revealed HIPV production not only in the oviposited plants but also in neighbouring plants not exposed to insect eggs. Higher amounts of EAG-active biogenic volatiles such as (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene were emitted from these plants compared to control plants. Subsequent behavioural assays with female T. bournieri and C. sesamiae parasitic wasps indicated that these parasitoids preferred volatiles from oviposited and neighbouring landrace plants compared to those from the control plants. This effect was absent in the standard commercial hybrid we tested. There was no HIPV induction and no difference in parasitoid attraction in neighbouring and control hybrid maize plants. These results show plant-plant signalling: ‘Nyamula’ maize plants emitting oviposition-induced volatiles attractive to the herbivore’s natural enemies can induce this indirect defence trait in conspecific neighbouring undamaged maize plants. Maize plants growing in a field may thus benefit from this indirect defence through airborne signalling which may enhance the fitness of the volatile-emitting plant by increasing predation pressure on herbivores.

Highlights

  • In their natural habitats, plants live in complex communities comprising herbivores, pollinators, microbes, carnivores and neighbouring conspecific and other plants [1,2,3]

  • Plants respond to herbivore attack through production of a number of chemical signals known as herbivore-induce plant volatiles (HIPVs), which have direct and/or indirect effects on the attacking herbivore

  • Behavioural responses of parasitoids to headspace samples of volatiles from egg exposed, neighbouring and control maize plants. Both egg (T. bournieri) and larval (C. sesamiae) parasitoids were significantly attracted to volatiles from egg exposed landrace ‘Nyamula’ plants compared to those from plants not exposed to eggs and solvent controls (F2,33 = 10.37, P

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plants live in complex communities comprising herbivores, pollinators, microbes, carnivores and neighbouring conspecific and other plants [1,2,3]. Plants respond to herbivore attack through production of a number of chemical signals known as herbivore-induce plant volatiles (HIPVs), which have direct and/or indirect effects on the attacking herbivore. These chemical cues negatively affect the physiology or behaviour of the herbivore, either as toxins, digestibility reducers or deterrents [6, 7]. Plants use these HIPVs to attract natural enemies of the herbivores, as well as increase the foraging success of these natural enemies, thereby facilitating improved control of herbivores [8,9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call