Abstract
The purpose is to frame a challenging indictment against interpretation as a therapeutic method. This includes interpretation in general, whether meeting or failing to meet the criteria of adequate interpretation. Based on both the clinical and research literatures, the thesis is that interpretations serve to enhance the elevated role of the therapist as grand interpreter whose pronouncements are to be valued by the client. It is concluded that progress in the art and science of psychotherapy invites the exploration and development of alternative therapeutic methods.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
