An in-depth comparison of dielectric, ferroelectric, piezoelectric, energy storage, electrocaloric, and piezocatalytic properties of Ba0.92Ca0.08Zr0.09Ti0.91O3 and Ba0.92Ca0.08Sn0.09Ti0.91O3 piezoceramics

Abstract

The futuristic technology demands materials exhibiting multifunctional properties. Keeping this in mind, an in-depth investigation and comparison of the dielectric, ferroelectric, piezoelectric, energy storage, electrocaloric, and piezocatalytic properties have been carried out on Ba0.92Ca0.08Zr0.09Ti0.91O3 (BCZT) and Ba0.92Ca0.08Sn0.09Ti0.91O3 (BCST) lead-free compounds synthesized through the conventional solid state reaction method. Further, the Rietveld refinement against the XRD patterns affirmed the coexistence of orthorhombic (Amm2) and tetragonal (P4mm) phases at room temperature for both compounds. While BCZT compound demonstrated remarkable dielectric, piezoelectric, and piezocatalytic characteristics with maximum dielectric constant () ≈ 13304 near the Curie temperature ( ≈ 105 °C), converse piezoelectric coefficient ≈ 609 pm V-1 , power density () ≈ 89.71 KW cm-3 at room temperature, and 82.7 % Rhodamine B (RhB) dye degradation capability; on the other hand, BCST compound exceled in superior energy storage density () ≈ 191.8 mJ cm-3 with efficiency η ≈ 73.26% near room temperature and enhanced electrocaloric properties with adiabatic temperature change ≈ 0.980 K, isothermal entropy change ≈ 1.15 J Kg-1K-1 and a higher electrocaloric responsivity ) ≈ 0.49 K mm kV-1. These distinctions arise from the difference in ionic radii, lattice distortion, and the electronic configurations of the dopant ions, leading to a greater polarization change and a lower coercive electric field in the BCST ceramic. The outcome of the present study provides valuable insights for selecting a dopant tailored compound for specific application and underscores the potential of such ceramics in energy storage, piezocatalysis, and the development of advanced solid-state cooling devices for future applications.