Abstract

Accurate, long-term records of precipitation are required for the development of climate-informed decision support tools for agriculture. But rain gauges are too sparsely located to meet this need, and radar-derived precipitation measurements are too recent in duration. Using all readily available station records, spatiotemporally continuous estimates of precipitation were created by the PRISM Climate Group to address this problem. As with all interpolated data, the validity of the gridded PRISM product requires validation, and given the extreme spatiotemporal variability of precipitation, such validation is essential. Previous work comparing the monthly precipitation product against contributing rain gauge data revealed inconsistencies that prompted the analysis reported herein. As a basis for checking the accuracy of the PRISM product, independent precipitation data gathered at a USDA research laboratory in central Oklahoma were quality controlled, including comparison to a co-located automated rain gauge operated by the Oklahoma Mesonet. Results indicate that the independent USDA gauge data are of sufficient quality to use in the evaluation of the PRISM product. The area average of the independent USDA data over a matching size area was then used to validate colocated gridded PRISM estimates. The validation results indicate that the monthly gridded PRISM precipitation estimates are close to the independent observed data in terms of means (smaller by 3% to 4.5%) and cumulative probability distributions (within ~4%), but with variances too small by 7% to 11%. From the point of view of agricultural decision support, these results indicate that PRISM estimates might be useful for probabilistic applications, such as downscaling climate forecasts or driving weather generators, assuming appropriate corrections to the higher-order statistics were applied. However, the number of months with potentially significant differences precludes the use of PRISM estimates for any retrospective month-by-month analyses of possible interactions between climate, crop management, and productivity.

Highlights

  • There is a pair of well-known challenges relative to developing climatologies of precipitation: 1) the amount of water reaching the earth’s surface varies significantly on all space and time scales; and 2) precipitation is very difficult to measure accurately

  • As a basis for checking the accuracy of the PRISM product, independent precipitation data gathered at a USDA research laboratory in central Oklahoma were quality controlled, including comparison to a co-located automated rain gauge operated by the Oklahoma Mesonet

  • From the point of view of agricultural decision support, these results indicate that PRISM estimates might be useful for probabilistic applications, such as downscaling climate forecasts or driving weather generators, assuming appropriate corrections to the higher-order statistics were applied

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is a pair of well-known challenges relative to developing climatologies of precipitation: 1) the amount of water reaching the earth’s surface varies significantly on all space and time scales; and 2) precipitation is very difficult to measure accurately. Recently have space-filling, frequent observational estimates of precipitation based on radar data become available, so we know very little about the long-term statistical characteristics of precipitation for most locations. The quality control and grid-filling algorithms reported for the PRISM grid data generation appear to be a rational approach to a difficult problem, using existing station data available from many sources and accounting for most of the known terrain and coastal factors that impact climate on spatial scales of a few kilometers, including altitude. Biological science technicians at the USDA/ARS Grazinglands Research Laboratory, west of El Reno, OK, had been gathering and saving such records for several decades in support of agricultural research These climatologies needed to be digitized, reformatted, and quality controlled, but the resulting precipitation climatology provides an opportunity to evaluate the PRISM precipitation time series at one location in central Oklahoma

Independent Data from Fort Reno
Quality Assessment of Fort Reno Precipitation Data
Comparison to Oklahoma Mesonet Gauge Data
Comparison of PRISM Precipitation Estimates to Fort Reno Data
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.