Abstract

<p>The Government intends to replace the Mental Health Act 1983, and the most recent of its proposals were contained in the Draft Mental Health Bill published in June 2004.</p><p>The 1983 Act is now very different to the statute introduced at the end of 1982. Parliament and the courts have made a number of significant changes over the last 20-odd years, and they have brought us a lot closer to the next Mental Health Act than many people – and possibly even the Government – suppose. In fact, those changes may have brought us rather close to the Draft Mental Health Bill. That will be an uncomfortable thought for many people.</p><p>This paper will consider five key aspects of the Draft Mental Health Bill:</p><p>• the provisions dealing with risk and treatability;</p><p>• the notion of compulsion in the community;</p><p>• the status of the Code of Practice; and</p><p>• the abolition of the Approved Social Worker.</p><p>The paper will ask whether, because of the changes of the last two decades, the current Mental Health Act has already arrived at much the same point. In addition, the paper will consider the position of incapable patients. Although the Draft Bill contains precious few proposals about them, the paper will ask whether recent developments have made a broad definition of mental disorder all but essential.</p>

Highlights

  • The Government intends to replace the Mental Health Act 1983, and the most recent of its proposals were contained in the Draft Mental Health Bill published in June 2004.3 (The Draft Bill has undergone ‘pre-legislative scrutiny’, and the Joint Committee appointed to perform the task published its report on 23 March 2005.4 The Government published its response to that report on 13 July 2005.5 )

  • (d) As for the Code of Practice, it’s not as strong as many believe, so even the weak Code envisaged by the Draft Bill won’t, in truth, be any weaker

  • An Approved Social Worker (ASW) embedded in a mental health partnership or care trust might be an Approved Mental Health Professional in all but name

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Government intends to replace the Mental Health Act 1983, and the most recent of its proposals were contained in the Draft Mental Health Bill published in June 2004.3 (The Draft Bill has undergone ‘pre-legislative scrutiny’, and the Joint Committee appointed to perform the task published its report on 23 March 2005.4 The Government published its response to that report on 13 July 2005.5 ). Parliament and the courts have made a number of significant changes over the last 20-odd years, and they have brought us a lot closer to the Mental Health Act than many people – and possibly even the Government – suppose. Those changes may have brought us rather close to the Draft Mental Health Bill. This paper will consider five key aspects of the Draft Mental Health Bill:. The paper will ask whether, because of the changes of the last two decades, the current Mental Health Act has already arrived at much the same point. Them, the paper will ask whether recent developments have made a broad definition of mental disorder all but essential

The Relevant Conditions
Non-resident Patients
The Code of Practice
An Approved Mental Health Professional
Incapable patients
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.