Abstract

This work aims to integrate defragmented migration perspectives in order to better understand and explain reasons of contemporaneous migration. Accordingly, international migration flows are explained with various socio-economic determinants which address different sources of migration, reinforced by the best-known theories and conceptual frameworks. A panel data analysis is performed at the level of rich and poor countries of the European Union to measure migration flows from the year 2000 until 2013. The results provide evidence indicating that there are some structural similarities and discrepancies between European rich and poor countries. These similarities (or discrepancies) make them responding similarly to certain economic conditions and changes. Thus, the association of earnings, inequalities (measured by the Gini Index) and poverty line could be positive or negative depending on wealth level of countries. Moreover, unemployment is a supply-push factor, but its importance is much higher in rich countries, diminishing in poorer countries. Economic freedom has a very strong positive effect on migration for all countries, but its relevance turned out to be the highest in the group of the poorest countries. Also, the association between Foreign Direct Investment and migration is negative, but it is more significant in the case of poorer countries.

Highlights

  • Birth, death and migration are the three fundamental demographic processes that determine population changes

  • In the last 15 years of the new century migration processes have even intensified in Europe

  • The results showed that outward US Foreign Direct Investment is positively correlated with the presence of migrants from the host country in USA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Death and migration are the three fundamental demographic processes that determine population changes. The difference between births and deaths numbers constitutes the natural population change (i.e. natural growth). Recent demographic processes (reflected in Eurostat data) show a continuous decline of natural growth in majority of the European Union countries. The relevance of international migration for population growth in these countries remains unquestionable (Dobson, Sennikova 2007). Castles and Miller (1993) called the late twentieth century “the age of migration”. In the last 15 years of the new century migration processes have even intensified in Europe. The sheer magnitude of migration flows that is reflected in the data seems to confirm it (Josifidis et al 2014; Bonfanti 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call