Abstract

SummaryTo reduce the possibility of probe deflections, conventional thermo‐time domain reflectometry (T‐TDR) sensors have relatively short probe lengths (≤4 cm). However, short probes lead to large errors in TDR‐estimated soil water content (θv). In this study, two new 6‐cm‐long probe‐spacing‐correction T‐TDR (CT‐TDR) sensors were investigated. Compared with conventional 4‐cm‐long T‐TDR sensors, the 6‐cm‐long CT‐TDR sensors reduced errors in TDR‐estimated θv. Errors in heat pulse (HP)‐estimated θv because of probe deflections were reduced when linear or nonlinear probe‐spacing‐correction algorithms were implemented. The 6‐cm‐long CT‐TDR sensors provided more accurate θv estimations than do the conventional 4‐cm‐long T‐TDR sensors.Highlights Short thermo‐TDR sensor has shortcomings in determining soil water content. Changes in thermo‐TDR probe spacing caused by deflections can be determined in situ. Correcting changed thermo‐TDR probe spacing determined soil water content accurately. The 6‐cm‐long thermo‐TDR sensors determined soil water content more accurately than 4‐cm‐long sensors.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.