Abstract
Background and objectiveAccurate numerical and physical models of trabecular bone, correctly representing its complexity and variability, could be highly advantageous in the development of e.g. new bone-anchored implants due to the limited availability of real bone. Several Voronoi tessellation-based porous models have been reported in the literature, attempting to mimic the trabecular bone. However, these models have been limited to lattice rod-like structures, which are only structurally representative of very high-porosity trabecular bone. The objective of this study was to provide an improved model, more representative of trabecular bone of different porosity. MethodsBoolean operations were utilized to merge scaled Voronoi cells, thereby introducing different structural patterns, controlling porosity and to some extent anisotropy. The mechanical properties of the structures were evaluated using analytical estimations, numerical simulations, and experimental compression tests of 3D-printed versions of the structures. The capacity of the developed models to represent trabecular bone was assessed by comparing some key geometric features with trabecular bone characterized in previous studies. ResultsThe models gave the possibility to provide pore interconnectivity at relatively low porosities as well as both plate- and rod-like structures. The mechanical properties of the generated models were predictable with numerical simulations as well as an analytical approach. The permeability was found to be better than Sawbones at the same porosity. The models also showed the capability of matching e.g. some vertebral structures for key geometric features. ConclusionsAn improved numerical model for mimicking trabecular bone structures was successfully developed using Voronoi tessellation and Boolean operations. This is expected to benefit both computational and experimental studies by providing a more diverse and representative structure of trabecular bone.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.