Abstract

The investigation depth of transient electromagnetic sensors can be effectively increased by reducing the system noise, which is mainly composed of sensor internal noise, electromagnetic interference (EMI), and environmental noise, etc. A high-sensitivity airborne transient electromagnetic (AEM) sensor with low sensor internal noise and good shielding effectiveness is of great importance for deep penetration. In this article, the design and optimization of such an AEM sensor is described in detail. To reduce sensor internal noise, a noise model with both a damping resistor and a preamplifier is established and analyzed. The results indicate that a sensor with a large diameter, low resonant frequency, and low sampling rate will have lower sensor internal noise. To improve the electromagnetic compatibility of the sensor, an electromagnetic shielding model for a central-tapped coil is established and discussed in detail. Previous studies have shown that unclosed shields with multiple layers and center grounding can effectively suppress EMI and eddy currents. According to these studies, an improved differential AEM sensor is constructed with a diameter, resultant effective area, resonant frequency, and normalized equivalent input noise of 1.1 m, 114 m2, 35.6 kHz, and 13.3 nV/m2, respectively. The accuracy of the noise model and the shielding effectiveness of the sensor have been verified experimentally. The results show a good agreement between calculated and measured results for the sensor internal noise. Additionally, over 20 dB shielding effectiveness is achieved in a complex electromagnetic environment. All of these results show a great improvement in sensor internal noise and shielding effectiveness.

Highlights

  • Over the last two decades, airborne transient electromagnetic (AEM) systems have become increasingly popular for hydrogeophysical investigations, engineering surveys, unexploded ordnance (UXO) detection, as well as geological mapping and mineral exploration [1,2,3]

  • Coil diameter D and resonant frequency f 0 corresponding to the area below area below the red satisfy the conditions, which means that awith larger diameter with a lower the red line satisfy theline conditions, which means that a larger diameter a lower resonant frequency resonant frequency can achieve lower sensor internal noise

  • Coil diameter D and resonant frequency f0 corresponding to the area below the red line satisfy the conditions, which means that a larger diameter with a lower resonant frequency can achieve lower sensor internal noise

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the last two decades, airborne transient electromagnetic (AEM) systems have become increasingly popular for hydrogeophysical investigations, engineering surveys, unexploded ordnance (UXO) detection, as well as geological mapping and mineral exploration [1,2,3]. Tumanski et al calculated parameters, such as the resultant area, direct current (DC) resistance, and SNR of an induction coil [10] They considered thermal noise of the coil’s DC resistor as the only noise source and did not take into account the preamplifier noise, which, plays an important role in the sensor internal noise. A new shielded receiver coil with a noise level 2–3 times less than the conventional one has been developed by SkyTEM [17] Problems such as shielding effectiveness optimization, eddy current suppression, and shield grounding are rarely discussed in detail. With the sensor internal noise level determined by penetration depth, the noise model with both induction coil and preamplifier is established and analyzed first. Experiments are conducted to verify the accuracy of the sensor internal noise model and electromagnetic compatibility of the sensor

Sensor Internal Noise Determination
Penetration
Structure and Equivalent Electrical Model of the Induction Coil
Structure
Schematic
Electrical Parameters Estimation
We assume that every
Noise Model of the Sensor
Sensor Internal Noise Model
Sensor
Noise Simplification
Determination of the Sensor Parameters
Determination
Coil diameter D and resonant frequency f0 corresponding to the internal noise
Determination of Cross-Section Radius
Contour
Determination of the Bandwidth of the System
Effectiveness of Coil Shielding
12 Z S1 j C2 N Z S2
Structure of Coil Shielding
Experiment
12. Experimental
Sensor Internal Noise of the Sensor
13. Comparison
The Shielding Effectiveness Testing
Conclusions and Prospects
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.