An improved heuristic algorithm for the maximum benefit Chinese postman problem

Abstract

The maximum benefit Chinese postman problem (MBCPP) is a practical generalization of the Chinese postman problem. A distinctive feature of MBCPP is that the postman can traverse each edge arbitrary times and obtains a benefit for each traversal of an edge, which depends on the number of times that the edge has been traversed. (Pearn and Wang, Omega 31 (2003) 269–273) discussed MBCPP under the assumption that the benefits of each edge is a non-increasing function of the number of traversals. They showed that MBCPP under this assumption is NP-hard, and proposed a heuristic algorithm which applies the minimum spanning tree and the minimal-cost T-join algorithms. (Corberán, Plana, Rodríguez-Chía and Sanchis, Math. Program. 141 (2013) 21–48) presented an integer programming formulation and a branch-and-cut algorithm for MBCPP without the assumption on the benefits. This is based on the idea of integrating the benefits of each edge into two benefits, each representing that the edge is traversed an odd or even number of times. In this paper, by applying the idea of Corberán et al., we improve the heuristic algorithm of Pearn and Wang. Our algorithm applies to the general case with no assumption on the benefits, and can perform better even if the benefits are non-increasing. We then analyze the efficiency of our heuristic algorithm in theory and in practice, and prove that it finds the optimal solution when the benefits satisfy a certain property.