Abstract

Hydrological models are widely used as simplified, conceptual, mathematical representatives for water resource management. The performance of hydrological modeling is usually challenged by model calibration and uncertainty analysis during modeling exercises. In this study, a multicriteria sequential calibration and uncertainty analysis (MS-CUA) method was proposed to improve the efficiency and performance of hydrological modeling with high reliability. To evaluate the performance and feasibility of the proposed method, two case studies were conducted in comparison with two other methods, sequential uncertainty fitting algorithm (SUFI-2) and generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE). The results indicated that the MS-CUA method could quickly locate the highest posterior density regions to improve computational efficiency. The developed method also provided better-calibrated results (e.g., the higher NSE value of 0.91, 0.97, and 0.74) and more balanced uncertainty analysis results (e.g., the largest P/R ratio values of 1.23, 2.15, and 1.00) comparing with other traditional methods for both case studies.

Highlights

  • Hydrological models are widely used as simplified, conceptual, mathematical representatives for water resource management

  • The real case study was conducted for four iterations, and the results are compared with the results from SUFI-2 and generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE)

  • A comprehensive analysis was achieved according to the hypothetical case results with demo data from soil and water assessment tool (SWAT)-CUP and the real case study at upstream of the Wenjing River watershed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hydrological models are widely used as simplified, conceptual, mathematical representatives for water resource management. All those values of different indicators showed that the last iteration achieved the best-calibrated simulation with the most balanced uncertainty analysis results. The MS-CUA method can effectively calibrate the hydrological model and provide reasonably good uncertainty analysis results through four iterations.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.