Abstract

The implementation of a phase-field model in finite elements usually requires significant expertise and involves the development of a user element with additional degrees of freedom. An alternative implementation of the phase-field model within a thermo-mechanical finite element simulation package was presented in (Cho et al 2012 Int. J. Solids Struct. 49 1973–1992), where the phase-field variable is treated as the temperature degree of freedom. However, this approach has only been used for small strain phase-field modelling of martensitic transformations and quasistatic phase-field modelling of fracture. In this work, we present a phase-field finite element implementation via the temperature degree of freedom for several additional cases from the literature: (i) the large-strain phase-field description of deformation twinning presented in (Clayton and Knap 2011 Physica D 240 841–858), (ii) phase-field description of brittle fracture with inertial effects based on the theory from (Molnár and Gravouil 2017, Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 130 27–38) and (Miehe et al 2010 Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 83 1273–1311) and (iii) the classical Stefan problem of solidification presented in (Mackenzie and Robertson 2002 J. Comput. Phys. 181 526–544). The last problem involves the temperature and phase-field variables as unknowns.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call