Abstract
He concludes that 'supporters of the conventional legal position held that there was no general right of access' 1 ( e ; and that 'the outcome of this debate was that the existing-rights approach found political favour, but it is not conceded by legal opinion'^. But, very surprisingly, he does not mention one of the Justice 2 Committee's key conclusions that the Government's understanding of the legal position relating to trespass and the 'freedom to roam' was different from previously (see A.3 below).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
