Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this article is to analyze the historical development of HRD knowledge. The analysis aims to use the qualitative research technique of text deconstruction on an important management text from the human relations phase of organization theory. Deconstruction is not a common method to HRD. In this paper, HRD scholars interested in how HRD knowledge and theories are created are given this tool to expose implicit assumptions.Design/methodology/approachThe article uses text deconstruction, based on Bradshaw.FindingsThe deconstruction identified several beliefs that suggest that Roethlisberger was operating from a masculine epistemological perspective. Two clusters of findings emerged: one cluster revolved around the role of the researcher, and the other cluster revolved around the role of gender.Research limitations/implicationsPostpositivist perspectives on knowledge generation and theory building in HRD are limited. Post‐structural analyses need to be considered.Practical implicationsThe article exposes how a gendered history influenced HRD scholarship and practice, and provides suggestions for future scholarship and practice.Originality/valueLegitimizes text deconstruction as an integral research tool for HRD.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
