Abstract

Soil-transmitted helminths are parasitic nematodes that inhabit the human intestine. These parasites, which include two hookworm species, Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus, the whipworm Trichuris trichiura , and the large roundworm Ascaris lumbricoides , infect upwards of two billion people and are a major cause of disease burden in children and pregnant women. The challenge with treating these diseases is that poverty, safety, and inefficient public health policy have marginalized drug development and distribution to control infection in humans. Anthelmintics (anti-worm drugs) have historically been developed and tested for treatment of non-human parasitic nematodes that infect livestock and companion animals. Here we systematically compare the in vitro efficacy of all major anthelmintic classes currently used in human therapy (benzimidazoles, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists, macrocyclic lactones, nitazoxanide) against species closely related to human parasitic nematodes-Ancylostoma ceylanicum, Trichuris muris , and Ascaris suum --- as well as a rodent parasitic nematode used in veterinary drug discovery, Heligmosomoides bakeri , and the free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Extensive in vitro data is complemented with single-dose in vivo data in three rodent models of parasitic diseases. We find that the effects of the drugs in vitro and in vivo can vary greatly among these nematode species, e.g., the efficacy of albendazole is strong on A. ceylanicum but weak on H . bakeri . Nonetheless, certain commonalities of the in vitro effects of the drugs can be seen, e.g., nitazoxanide consistently shows an all-or-nothing response. Our in vitro data suggest that further optimization of the clinical efficacy of some of these anthelmintics could be achieved by altering the treatment routine and/or dosing. Most importantly, our in vitro and in vivo data indicate that the hookworm A. ceylanicum is a particularly sensitive and useful model for anthelmintic studies and should be incorporated early on in drug screens for broad-spectrum human soil-transmitted helminth therapies.

Highlights

  • Soil-transmitted helminths (STHs), which include two hookworm species, Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus, the whipworm Trichuris trichiura, and the large roundworm Ascaris lumbricoides, infect upwards to two billion people and are a leading source of disease burden in more than 400,000,000 children [1,2,3,4]

  • The World Health Organization (WHO) and world leaders are calling for the elimination of these parasites in children through mass drug administration as the only proven method for control

  • All housing and care of laboratory animals used in this study conform to the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals in Research and all requirements and all regulations issued by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), including regulations implementing the Animal Welfare Act (P.L. 89-544) as amended

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Soil-transmitted helminths (STHs), which include two hookworm species, Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus, the whipworm Trichuris trichiura, and the large roundworm Ascaris lumbricoides, infect upwards to two billion people and are a leading source of disease burden in more than 400,000,000 children [1,2,3,4]. The drugs of choice are the benzimidazoles, mebendazole and albendazole (ALB); the two alternatives are the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonists pyrantel (PYR) and levamisole. All of these drugs were developed for treating veterinary parasites [7,8]. Under single-dose mass drug administration (MDA) treatment regimens for STHs, all work well against Ascaris, poorly against whipworms, and, with the exception of ALB, poorly against hookworms. Ivermectin (IVM), a macrocyclic lactone discovered for veterinary application [12] and used to treat filarial nematode infections in humans, is not typically used for STHs because of its relatively low efficacy against hookworms and whipworms [6]. NTZ is typically used as six doses over a period of three days to enhance efficacy [13]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call