Abstract
The current study builds on extant publication productivity CCJ research by applying a social network analysis to examine the presence of an “invisible college” of scholarship in experimental CCJ scholarship. Relying on data from 298 articles and 678 unique authors published in the Journal of Experimental Criminology (JEC) from 2011 to 2020, the results suggest that publishing networks are largely decentralized, but many key networks do exist and those networks can have definitive leaders that are critical players in the network. Given the information that was derived from the present study, continued exploration into publishing networks is suggested using social network analysis techniques. Study limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
