Abstract

(1) Background: The approach of bleeding complications in patients treated with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) represents an important issue in clinical practice. Both dabigatran and apixaban are substrates for P-glycoprotein and, therefore, ABCB1 gene variations may be useful in individualizing NOACs treatment, especially in high-risk patients. (2) Methods: ABCB1 rs1045642 and rs4148738 were determined in 218 atrial fibrillation patients treated with dabigatran or apixaban (70.94 ± 9.04 years; 51.83% men). (3) Results: Non-major bleeding appeared in 7.34% NOACs–treated patients. The logistic tested models based on the four genetic models revealed no significant association between the variant genotype of two ABCB1 SNPs and the risk of bleeding (p > 0.05). Among the four two-locus haplotypes, TA and CA haplotypes had the highest frequency in NOACs-treated patients with bleeding, involving a possible positive association with the susceptibility of bleeding complications (OR = 1.04 and OR = 1.91, respectively). The logistic model found no significant association of estimated haplotypes with bleeding (p > 0.05) except for the TG haplotype which had a trend toward statistical significance (p = 0.092). Among the risk factors for bleeding, only age > 70 years and stroke/TIA showed a tendency toward statistical significance. (4) Conclusions: We found no significant associations between the studied ABCB1 variant genotypes with non-major bleeding risk in NOACs-treated patients. A trend of association between TG haplotype with bleeding risk was observed, implying a protective role of this haplotype against bleeding in patients treated with dabigatran or apixaban.

Highlights

  • Assuming that the presence of genetic polymorphisms may influence the effects of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) treatment on the clinical outcome of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients, this study aimed to evaluate the association of the ABCB1 gene SNPs with bleeding in patients from the real-world clinical practice treated with dabigatran and apixaban

  • We did not find statistically significant differences in the distribution of demographic characteristics in patients treated with dabigatran and those treated with apixaban (p > 0.05)

  • We did not find a statistically significant difference in CHA2DS2-VASc (p = 0.975) and HAS-BLED scores (p = 0.206), as well as in echocardiographic parameters values in patients treated with dabigatran vs. those receiving apixaban

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Current guidelines recommend NOACs as first-line treatment in NVAF patients due to the certain clinical benefits they have shown for vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) in the prophylaxis of thromboembolic events, especially strokes [4,5]. NOACs have a wide therapeutic window and predictable pharmacokinetics [6], they present several disadvantages that make the clinical decision difficult: inability of routine coagulation monitoring, and compliance monitoring, marked inter-individual variability in plasma levels, and interactions with certain drugs, some frequently used in the treatment of AF that may increase the risk of bleeding complications, especially in vulnerable patients [7]. Dabigatran etexilate, a direct selective thrombin inhibitor, has a reversible linear anticoagulant effect. It is administered at a dose of 150 mg b.i.d or 110 mg b.i.d in patients at a high risk of bleeding [10]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call