Abstract
It has been widely reported that natural gas dual-fuel combustion (DFC) can achieve much lower soot emissions in contrast to conventional diesel combustion (CDC). Thus, using low-pressure direct injection (LPDI) systems could be an alternative for current high-pressure common rail injection systems, which would significantly reduce the system cost. The present study aimed at exploring the feasibility of LPDI (low to 200 bar) for natural gas DFC in combination of the advanced low temperature combustion technology. The comparative study between natural gas DFC and CDC were carried out. For natural gas DFC, larger advanced injection timing was used to realize low temperature combustion and achieve long ignition delay in order to counteract the negative impact of relatively poor atomization quality caused by the low injection pressure. At DFC mode, higher CO and THC emissions were observed compared to CDC in the cases without EGR. However, DFC was much less sensitive to EGR rate and injection pressure. Natural gas DFC could break the trade-off between NOx and soot emissions, which could achieve low soot and NOx emissions (lower than Europe VI standard: 0.4 g/kW·h) simultaneously at the 42% EGR rate and the 200 bar injection pressure.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
