Abstract
Orientation: The management of supply chain risks, disruptions and vulnerabilities has become a significant issue in supply chain management research in recent times.Research purpose: The purpose of this study was threefold, namely to (1) determine whether there is a clear understanding of supply chain risk management (SCRM) within the South African third-party logistics service providers (3PL) industry, (2) investigate the primary sources that lead to disruptions and vulnerabilities within the supply chains of South African 3PL organisations and (3) establish the current tools or methods used by supply chain practitioners to mitigate supply chain risks within the 3PL industry in South Africa.Motivation for the study: Supply chain risks are ever increasing and evolving which may have a substantial influence on organisational and supply chain performance.Research design, approach and method: A generic qualitative research method was used to gather data. A total of 20 purposively selected participants drawn from 20 3PL organisations with headquarters located in Gauteng province participated in semi-structured interviews.Main findings: The findings indicate a juxtaposition regarding South African 3PL supply chain practitioners’ understanding of SCRM compared to literature, as the participants were found to only identify certain tenets of SCRM with no single participant comprehensively describing SCRM according to the literature. External disruptions, namely customer- and supply-side disruptions within the South African 3PL industry were found to be the primary sources of supply chain disruptions. The findings further indicate that supply chain vulnerabilities emanate predominantly from labour strikes and cyberattacks.Practical/managerial implications: The implementation of SCRM is constrained by the high costs of implementation, the unwillingness of supply chain partners to buy into SCRM, power imbalances in supply chain relationships and other uncontrollable factors between different supply chain members.Contribution/value-add: Supply chain practitioners in the 3PL industry should realise the significance of effective SCRM practices, as well as the positive impact proactive SCRM practices could have on their organisations as well as on supply chain partners.
Highlights
Introduction and problem statementAs organisations seek to improve and strengthen their supply chains to be more effective and efficient, their actions may result in more vulnerability towards risks and disruptions (Ho et al 2015:5047; Jüttner 2005:121)
The findings of this study revealed that each participant’s understanding of supply chain risk management (SCRM) varied, which corroborates the literature which states that there is no standard grasp of the concept (Heckmann et al 2015:120; König & Spinler 2016:127)
This corresponds to the literature stating that organisations’ supply chains tend to be more vulnerable to external disruptions (Costantino et al 2014:3; Nel, de Goede & Niemann 2017:10; Prakash et al 2017:80)
Summary
As organisations seek to improve and strengthen their supply chains to be more effective and efficient, their actions may result in more vulnerability towards risks and disruptions (Ho et al 2015:5047; Jüttner 2005:121). Supply chain risk management (SCRM) has become a critical concern for organisations (Asian & Nie 2014:1136; Costantino et al 2014:4; Kakabadse & Khan 2016:1; Kilubi 2016a:663; Trkman, Oliveira & McCormack 2016:1061). A supply chain disruption is an event that causes a disruption or inhibits the flow of goods, or services, within a supply chain (Ambulkar, Blackhurst & Grawe 2015:111; Bode & Wagner 2015:216; Costantino et al 2014:5; Kim, Chen & Linderman 2015:44)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
