Abstract

Educators in the field of instructional technology believe that Instructional Design (ID) theory and microdesign models have great potential to help teachers teach effectively. However, the available information on teachers' use of instructional design practices is not encouraging. Several professionals in the field pointed out the importance of examining research about teaching and teachers outside of the educational technology field. This study attempted to address this issue through an exploratory and in-depth examination of an expert teacher's thinking and teaching processes and to link those to instructional design procedures. The study employed a naturalistic approach which combined different methodological techniques. Data were analyzed in the constant comparative styl, which allowed categories to emerge from the data. The generated conceptual model of the teacher's thinking and teaching was then compared to microinstructional systems design models and principles. The findings suggested that there were fundamental differences between the teacher's thinking and teaching processes and microinstructional design models.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.