Abstract
Introduction: An expert’s role is to guide the courts in matters related to a particular speciality. In a case of alleged sexual assault an expert is expected to document the history, examination findings and collect available evidence in order to corroborate accounts of sexual assault for courts of law. However in many instances, the medico-legal evidence has shown its limitations and inconsistencies of expert evidence which are known to result in miscarriage of justice. Objective: Find out the strengths and limitations that are encountered by an expert when giving opinions in relation to alleged sexual abuse victims Methodology Opinions stated in the Medico-Legal Reports (MLR) sent to courts by the authors during the last decade were analyzed. 20 reports from each age group (0-5, 6-10, 11-16, above 16 years) were randomly selected and the allegations and the opinions were analysed according to a scale developed. Results: Out of 80 reports analyzed majority were females (female to male 10.4: 1). The allegation in all age groups except primary schooling group was penetration of an orifice. In the age group less than 10 (preschool and primary schooling), the medico-legal opinion did not support the allegation in almost half the cases. (support: non support is 1.05:1). In the age group more than 10 years the opinion supported the allegation (4.9:1). There was a statistically significant difference between these two groups. (p:0.001). Conclusions : when the examinee is less than 10 years of age difficulties arose for the medical expert to express an opinion. The law enforcement authorities and the judiciary should be aware of this limitation and it is important to find other corroborative evidence to support or disprove the given allegations. Medico-Legal Journal of Sri Lanka 2015; 3(1) : 10-15
Highlights
An expert’s role is to guide the courts in matters related to a particular speciality
In the age group less than 10, the medico-legal opinion did not support the allegation in almost half the cases
When the examinee is less than 10 years of age difficulties arose for the medical expert to express an opinion
Summary
An expert’s role is to guide the courts in matters related to a particular speciality. Examination of an alleged sexual abuse victim and forming opinions to a court of law is a challenge to any medical expert especially when the facts on which the opinion is based is doubtful, scant or at times, even nonexistent [2]. In a Stakeholders’ meeting at the Ministry of Justice to resolve issues of alleged sexual abuse cases pending indictment, the importance of having quality medico-legal opinions by the experts was highlighted [10]. It is time to find out the strengths and limitations of medical opinions given by Sri Lankan experts if we are to improve the overall quality of imparting justice in alleged sexual abuse
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
