Abstract

Hosts can counteract parasites through defences based on resistance and/or tolerance. The mechanistic basis of tolerance, which involve defensive mechanisms minimizing parasite damage after a successful parasitic attack, remains poorly explored in the study of cuckoo-host interactions. Here, we experimentally explore the possibility that the risk of great spotted cuckoo Clamator glandarius parasitism may induce tolerance defences in magpie Pica pica hosts through plasticity in life-history traits. We predict that magpies exposed to auditory cues indicating high parasitism risk will more likely exhibit resistance and/or modify their life-history traits to minimize parasitism costs (i.e. tolerance) compared to magpies under low parasitism risk. We found that manipulating the perceived parasitism risk did not affect host resistance (i.e. rejection of parasitic eggs) nor host life-history traits. Unexpectedly, host’s egg volume increased over the season in nests exposed to auditory cues of control non-harmful hoopoes Upupa epops. Our results do not provide support for inducible defences (either based on resistance or tolerance) in response to risk of parasitism in magpie hosts. Even so, we encourage studying plastic expression of breeding strategies in response to risk of cuckoo parasitism to achieve a better understanding of the mechanistic basis of tolerance defences.

Highlights

  • Parasitism is a strong selective agent shaping host evolution [1]

  • Resistance involves physiological or behavioural defensive mechanisms that minimize the likelihood of being parasitized whereas tolerance involves defensive mechanisms reducing the negative effect of the parasite after a successful attack [6]

  • Magpies rejected 20 out of 54 (37.03%) model eggs; the risk of cuckoo parasitism did not influence egg rejection behaviour once we control for laying date (rejection rates were 34.78%, 35.71% and 41.17% for the increased risk of cuckoo parasitism, no-risk of cuckoo parasitism and control treatments, respectively(Treatment effect: χ22 = 0.14, P = 0.93; laying date effect: χ21 = 0.19, P = 0.67; TreatmentÃlaying date: χ22 = 0.58, P = 0.75)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Parasitism is a strong selective agent shaping host evolution [1]. Plant and animal hosts can minimize the negative effects of parasites through defences based on resistance and/or tolerance [2,3,4,5,6]. Resistance involves physiological or behavioural defensive mechanisms that minimize the likelihood of being parasitized whereas tolerance involves defensive mechanisms reducing the negative effect of the parasite after a successful attack [6]. Tolerance diminishes the impact of parasitism without necessarily causing a negative effect on the parasite [6,7].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call