Abstract

BackgroundDespite much empirical attention, tests for indirect benefits of mate choice have rarely considered the major components of sexual and nonsexual offspring fitness relevant to a population. Here we use a novel experimental design to test for the existence of any indirect benefits in a laboratory adapted population of D. melanogaster. Our experiment compared the fitness (mating success, longevity, and productivity) of individuals possessing genomes that derived two generations previously from males that were either entirely successful (studs) or wholly unsuccessful (duds) at achieving mates in three subsequent rounds of mating trials.ResultsMales from the stud treatment were 30% more successful on average at securing mates than males from the dud treatment. In contrast, we found no difference between treatments in measures of productivity or of longevity when measured in a mixed-sex environment. In the absence of females, however, males in the stud treatment outlived males in the dud treatment.ConclusionOur results suggest that mating with successful males in this population provides an indirect benefit to females and that, at least in this environment, the benefit arises primarily through the production of more attractive male offspring. However, it is unclear whether this represents solely a traditional sexy sons benefit or whether there is an additional good genes component (with male offspring simply allocating their surplus condition to traits that enhance their mating success). The lack of any detectable differences in female fitness between the two treatments suggests the former, although the longevity advantage of males in the stud treatment when females were absent is consistent with the latter. Determining the effect of this indirect benefit on the evolution of female mate preferences (or resistance) will require comparable data on the direct costs of mating with various males, and an understanding of how these costs and benefits integrate across generations and vary among environments.

Highlights

  • Despite much empirical attention, tests for indirect benefits of mate choice have rarely considered the major components of sexual and nonsexual offspring fitness relevant to a population

  • We use a novel experimental design to test for the existence of any indirect benefits in a laboratory-adapted population of D. melanogaster (Commercial Avenue strain)

  • Male mating success The grandsons of stud males were, on average, 30% more successful at securing mates than were the grandsons of dud males

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tests for indirect benefits of mate choice have rarely considered the major components of sexual and nonsexual offspring fitness relevant to a population. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2007, 7:36 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/7/36 interactions with males [4] This is especially true in Drosophila melanogaster, for which extensive data have demonstrated that males harm females during courtship and mating [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. This male-induced harm causes selection in females to resist it and, if the resulting female counteradaptations reduce male mating and/or fertilization success, a process of antagonistic co-evolution between the sexes, driven by interlocus sexual conflict, may result [4,12,13,14,15]. Such a process appears to be ongoing in at least one well studied D. melanogaster laboratory population [9,16,17,18]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call