Abstract
The purpose of this study is to revisit the production of the Korean ditransitive constructions reported in Park & Yi (2021). The phenomenon is puzzling particularly because the double accusative ditransitive construction tends to be judged highly unacceptable and rarely observed in natural language corpora, while speakers produced a non-trivial number of them in an experimental setting. This study attempts to replicate the results of their production experiment on a different pool of participants and with a much larger sample size (N=96). Based on this new dataset, we conduct quantitative and qualitative analysis of speakers’ free continuations after two types of prompts, i.e., including either dative- or accusative-marked animate argument as a potential recipient. We examine the validity of the previous results and also discuss a variety of continuations provided by participants and their implications for Korean sentence production.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The Journal of Mirae English Language and Literature
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.