Abstract

The modern undercarriage system of a large aircraft normally requires the landing gear to be retractable. The nose landing gear, installed in the front of the fuselage, is retracted either forward or rearward. In the forward/rearward retraction system, the landing gear is normally installed to the trailing/leading side of the bay. When the incoming flow passes the landing gear as well as the bay, the installation that corresponds to the forward/rearward retraction system has a significant impact on the coupling flow and the associated noise of the landing gear and the bay. In this paper, acoustic performance of the forward/rearward retraction of the nose landing gear was discussed based on experiment. The landing gear bay was simplified as a rectangular cavity, and tests were conducted in an aeroacoustics wind tunnel. The cavity oscillation was first analyzed with different incoming speeds. Then, the landing gear model was installed close to the trailing and the leading side of the cavity, respectively. It was observed that installation close to the leading side can help disturb the shear layer so as to suppress the oscillation, while the trailing one can make the landing gear itself produce lower noise. Accordingly, conclusions on the acoustic performance of the forward/rearward retraction of the nose landing gear are made.

Highlights

  • Aircraft noise is emitted by the aircraft or its component during a variety of flight phases such as approach and take-off

  • The relative contribution to the total emission from the airframe noise has increased to a new level, and it has become a major concern to the aeronautical engineers

  • The bay was simplified into a rectangular cavity, and a parametric study was conducted

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aircraft noise is emitted by the aircraft or its component during a variety of flight phases such as approach and take-off. The nose landing gear, which is installed in the front of the fuselage, is retracted either forward or rearward. As for the noise reduction, a few ideas have been proposed either for the landing gear or for the bay, such as the fairings [12, 13], plasma [14, 15], mesh [16, 17], air curtain [18,19,20,21], and upstream mass flow injection [22,23,24] Regardless of their technology readiness level (TRL), all of them have been confirmed to be able to achieve noise suppression. The noise of the bay, as well as its assembly with different nose landing gear installation, is discussed, corresponding to forward/rearward retraction. Conclusions on the acoustic performance of the forward/rearward retraction of the nose landing gear are made

Experimental Facilities and Instrumentation
Results and Discussion
Mode IV
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call