Abstract

Refraction sensitivity can be optimised for differential x-ray phase contrast (XPC) imaging methods by modifying the set-up. Often, modifications involve changing source/detector parameters, propagation distances, or the design of optical components, i.e. parameters that are not readily changed without non-trivial time investment, replacing components, or performing high-precision recalibrations. The edge illumination (EI) XPC method provides a method of optimising the refraction sensitivity, by exploiting micrometric translations of its periodic masks, that bypasses the constraints listed above. These translations can be performed on-the-fly and allow optimising the refraction signal for specific applications without making significant changes to the set-up. The method can prove advantageous for lab-based systems that make use of larger sources but with limited available set-up space. In this paper, we study how refraction sensitivity varies as a function of illuminated pixel fraction (IPF) under two commonly encountered experimental conditions: (1) at approximately constant detected counts, and (2) at equal exposure time. We compare the standard deviation in the background of reconstructed refraction images at different IPFs and find that refraction sensitivity is optimal at 25% IPF under both conditions. Finally, we demonstrate that refraction sensitivity affects the visibility of weakly refracting features on an insect leg. The results suggest that IPFs lower than 50% can actually be preferable, especially in the case where the statistics is kept constant, and provide experimental validation that phase sensitivity in EI is not fixed once the system parameters are defined.

Highlights

  • X-ray phase contrast (XPC) imaging systems are simultaneously sensitive to attenuation and phase effects

  • The results suggest that illuminated pixel fraction (IPF) lower than 50% can be preferable, especially in the case where the statistics is kept constant, and provide experimental validation that phase sensitivity in edge illumination (EI) is not fixed once the system parameters are defined

  • The work performed in this paper showed how the refraction sensitivity of an EI set-up varies as a function of IPF

Read more

Summary

Introduction

X-ray phase contrast (XPC) imaging systems are simultaneously sensitive to attenuation and phase effects. Recent developments in XPC imaging have been motivated by the observation that δ can be up to three orders of magnitude greater than β in parts of the x-ray regime. XPC setups can potentially target a wide range of applications such as security [3, 4], non-destructive testing [5, 6], and medical imaging [7, 8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call