Abstract

In this paper, theoretical and experimental approaches were used to evaluate the impact of the precursor’s pulse time on the growth per cycle (GPC) and on the crystallinity quality of atomic layer deposited TiO2 thin films on Si(100) and FTO substrates. In theoretical investigation, we employ a general model that can be applied to both metal and oxidant precursors, and it is based on the Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution from which the molecular flux of gases that collide with the substrate is deduced to adjust the experimental characteristics of GPC versus pulse time. This model allowed us to adjust the GPC of TiO2 films produced by thermal atomic layer deposition and by plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition under different deposition parameters and substrates. In experimental investigation, the influence of GPC on the chemical and structural properties of TiO2 thin films was evaluated by Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy, grazing incidence x-ray diffraction and ellipsometry techniques. In thermal mode, using H2O as an oxidant precursor, the stoichiometry of TiOx films has an x value of 1.98 from the GPC saturated regardless of the metal precursor or substrate used. In addition, using O2 plasma, a super-stoichiometric film with x values from 2.02 to 2.30 is obtained. In thermal mode, the GPC saturated and film thickness are, on average, 40% higher for TiCl4 compared to TTIP precursor. Using O2 plasma, the growth per cycle saturated is approximately twice as high the thermal mode using TTIP precursor. For both atomic layer deposition modes, the crystallinity degree showed values of 50% to 80% for TiCl4 in the temperature range of 250 to 350 oC. On the other hand, for TTIP, it was below 40% in thermal mode and between 80 and 95% in plasma mode (250 oC). It was observed that the reaction rate, the diffusion coefficient and the molecular flux are inversely proportional to the temperature. These results evidenced that the crystallinity and epitaxial quality of the TiO2 film are higher for TTIP using O2 plasma. However, a better stability of the parameters analyzed for TiCl4 in the two atomic layer deposition modes was verified.

Highlights

  • Atomic layer deposition (ALD) is a specific modification of the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technique, which is ideal for producing ultrathin films in the nanometer and Angstrom range

  • Stoichiometry and thickness of the TiO2 film were measured by Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS), and the thickness was confirmed by ellipsometry spectroscopy, Figures 3A,B show the experimental and simulated RBS spectra for TiO2 films deposited at 250◦C on FTO and Si, respectively

  • We show as an example, only the spectra related to the ALD pulse time, as follows-(purge with N2; 2.0 s)-(exposure to reaction gas of H2O; 0.25 s)-(purge with N2; 2.0 s) at 250◦C

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atomic layer deposition (ALD) is a specific modification of the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technique, which is ideal for producing ultrathin films in the nanometer and Angstrom range. In CVD an appropriate metal precursor vapor and a reaction gas are simultaneously dissociated in front of a heated substrate. The ALD reactor is purged with an inert gas between the exposures of the precursor vapor and the reaction gas. Each cycle of the ALD process usually consists of a sequence of metallic precursor exposure, purge, reaction gas exposure, and another purge. The film grows through chemisorption between the gaseous molecules (i.e., metallic precursor vapor or reactant gas) and reactive functional groups on the surface (i.e., hydroxyl groups or chemisorbed organometallic groups). Since vacant adsorption sites are saturated by adsorbate molecules to form a monolayer (practically the sub-monolayer is formed due to the bulkiness of adsorbate molecules), the precursor or reactant in excess does not chemically adsorb to the monolayer. The film grows via the self-limiting mechanism (Aarik and Siimon, 1994; Aarik et al, 1995; Sammelselg et al, 1998; Mitchell et al, 2003)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.