Abstract

The phylogenetic position of the Indian gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) is disputed - morphological characters place Gavialis as the sister to all other extant crocodylians, whereas molecular and combined analyses find Gavialis and the false gharial (Tomistoma schlegelii) to be sister taxa. Geometric morphometric techniques have only begun to be applied to this issue, but most of these studies have focused on the exterior of the skull. The braincase has provided useful phylogenetic information for basal crurotarsans, but has not been explored for the crown group. The Eustachian system is thought to vary phylogenetically in Crocodylia, but has not been analytically tested. To determine if gross morphology of the crocodylian braincase proves informative to the relationships of Gavialis and Tomistoma, we used two- and three-dimensional geometric morphometric approaches. Internal braincase images were obtained using high-resolution computerized tomography scans. A principal components analysis identified that the first component axis was primarily associated with size and did not show groupings that divide the specimens by phylogenetic affinity. Sliding semi-landmarks and a relative warp analysis indicate that a unique Eustachian morphology separates Gavialis from other extant members of Crocodylia. Ontogenetic expansion of the braincase results in a more dorsoventrally elongate median Eustachian canal. Changes in the shape of the Eustachian system do provide phylogenetic distinctions between major crocodylian clades. Each morphometric dataset, consisting of continuous morphological characters, was added independently to a combined cladistic analysis of discrete morphological and molecular characters. The braincase data alone produced a clade that included crocodylids and Gavialis, whereas the Eustachian data resulted in Gavialis being considered a basally divergent lineage. When each morphometric dataset was used in a combined analysis with discrete morphological and molecular characters, it generated a tree that matched the topology of the molecular phylogeny of Crocodylia.

Highlights

  • Modern crocodylians are one of two extant groups of archosaurs [1,2]

  • The superimposed landmarks were subjected to a Principal Components Analysis (PCA) to examine the shape changes associated with Principal Components (PC) axes

  • Three-dimensional analysis of the braincase The PCA of 3D braincase landmarks indicated that changes along the first two axes do not differentiate crocodylian clades

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Modern crocodylians are one of two extant groups of archosaurs [1,2] They first appear in the fossil record in the Late Cretaceous, between 80 and 90 million years ago [3,4,5]. Because of their excellent fossil record [6], the evolutionary relationships within and among many crocodylian clades are well understood. Some areas of the tree remain controversial, near the base of the crocodylian evolutionary tree. Among these is the phylogenetic position of the Indian gharial, Gavialis gangeticus, whose phylogenetic placement changes dramatically depending on which types of data are analyzed. Phylogenetic analyses of molecular (i.e. mitochondrial and nuclear DNA) and most analyses using a combination of molecular and discrete morphological data find Gavialis to be most closely related to the Malayan false gharial, Tomistoma schlegelii (e.g. [1,4,15,16,17,18,19,20,21])

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call