Abstract
This brief review gives an example of how editorial decisions can influence material presented in medical journals, leaving readers with an incomplete and therefore misleading view of important medical issues. It also gives a possible window into bias against homeopathic practitioners by editors of medical journals.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.