Abstract

BackgroundIn 2009, after many delays and changes, India introduced a single pictorial health warning label (HWL) on smokeless tobacco (SLT) packing—a symbolic image of a scorpion covering 40% of the front surface. In 2011, the scorpion was replaced with 4 graphic images. This paper tested the effectiveness of SLT HWLs in India and whether the 2011 change from symbolic to graphic images increased their effectiveness.MethodsData were from a cohort of 4733 adult SLT users (age15+) of the Tobacco Control Project (TCP) India Survey from 4 states. The surveys included key indicators of health warning effectiveness, including warning salience, and cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses to the warnings.ResultsThe HWL change from symbolic to graphic did not result in significant increases on any of the HWL outcome indicators. A substantial minority of SLT users were unaware that SLT packages contained HWLs (27% at both waves). Noticing the warnings was also remarkably low at both waves (W1 = 34.3%, W2 = 28.1%). These effects carried over to the cognitive and behavioural measures, where among those who noticed HWLs, about one-third reported forgoing SLT at least once because of the HWLs, and fewer than 20% reported that HWLs made them think about SLT risks or about quitting SLT. Even fewer reported avoiding HWLs (8.1 to 11.6%). Among those who quit using SLT by post-policy, awareness that SLT packaging contained HWLs was significantly greater at post-policy (86.8%) compared to pre-policy (77.8%, p = 0.02). Quitters were also significantly more aware of the post-policy HWLs compared to those who continued to use SLT (p < 0.001).ConclusionsHealth warnings on SLT packages in India are low in effectiveness, and the change from the symbolic warning (pre-policy) to graphic HWLs (post-policy) did not lead to significant increases of effectiveness on any of the HWL indicators among those who continued to use SLT products, thus suggesting that changing an image alone is not enough to have an impact. There is a critical need to implement SLT HWLs in India that are more salient (large in size and on the front and back of the package) and impactful, which following from studies of HWLs on cigarette packaging, would have strong potential to increase awareness of the harms of SLT and to motivate quitting.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3899-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • In 2009, after many delays and changes, India introduced a single pictorial health warning label (HWL) on smokeless tobacco (SLT) packing—a symbolic image of a scorpion covering 40% of the front surface

  • An adjusted generalized estimated equations (GEE) that included SLT quitters only, showed that awareness that SLT packaging contained HWLs was significantly greater at post-policy (86.8%) compared to pre-policy (77.8%, p = 0.02)

  • Unlike the strong evidence for the effectiveness of HWLs on smoked tobacco packaging [17, 19, 20], there is little evidence about the effectiveness of HWLs on SLT, and whether enhanced warnings on SLT packaging would impact emotional, cognitive, and behaviour changes among users. This study tested both of these objectives. The results of this first longitudinal study of HWLs on India’s SLT products showed that the effectiveness was very low at both pre- and post-policy, and the change from symbolic to graphic images did not increase any of the HWL indicators or intentions to quit SLT, neither among the entire cohort of SLT users nor among those using SLT products with mandated HWLs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2009, after many delays and changes, India introduced a single pictorial health warning label (HWL) on smokeless tobacco (SLT) packing—a symbolic image of a scorpion covering 40% of the front surface. SLT products in SEAR have been shown to cause a broad range of diseases and adverse health effects such as various types of cancers, cardiovascular disease, and adverse pregnancy outcomes [1, 2, 5, 6, 9,10,11]. The latter is striking, as SLT use is highly prevalent among reproductive age females in SEAR [11, 12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call