An Examination Of The Economic Impact Of Pension Rate Reductions On Future Pension Expense, Earnings, And Cash Flows: A Simulation

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a two-period analytical model of pension cost, which allows us to simulate pension expense and the associated earnings impact. These estimates are important because they provide information to the market, and because they are useful in estimating future cash flows or for other analytical purposes. This is especially true now, because the economic environment has deteriorated to a point that many investors perceive increased uncertainty with respect to pension plans and the effect they have on future income. Some plan sponsors have not been faced with pension plan losses for over a decade or longer, having enjoyed reduced or eliminated funding holidays as a result of high returns to pension plan assets. Given the current economic climate, however, these results (boosts to earnings due to pension credits and reduced or eliminated funding requirements) may change abruptly. In fact, several authors in the popular financial press have speculated on the impact of such fundamental changes in pension assets, liabilities and estimates. We simulate the potential results for two periods in the future based upon percentiles drawn from a sample of 1,116 firms taken from Compustat. We compute projected pension expense for the 25th percentile firm, the median firm, and the 75th percentile firm by varying the discount rates, expected rates of return, and actual asset return assumptions. Our results indicate that while the pension expense effect is large in both periods across small, mid-sized and large firms, large firms show the greatest increase in pension expense. Interestingly, however, the earnings impact is the smallest for large firms in both periods, and is not material in period one for both large and mid-sized firms. It is material for small firms. Firms with small pension plans appear to have the greatest earnings drag both one and two years into the future. In period two, all firms face significantly greater expense and earnings reductions, although again, smaller firms face the greatest impact. In addition, all firms face significantly increased cash funding requirements in order to prevent funding ratios (plan assets scaled by pension liabilities) from deteriorating. These results suggest not only future earnings reductions form pension rate changes, but also a potential cash flow impact as well.