Abstract
Recent criticisms of the two-factor theory of job satisfaction suggest that Herzberg's reliance upon the recall of critical incidents ( Ewen, 1964) and dual system of categorization ( Schneider and Locke, 1971) may have introduced a scaling bias in his method of experimentation which severely restricts respondents' opportunities to register negative reactions to motivators (Ms) and positive reactions to hygienes (Hs). Industrial trainees in two vocational education projects ( N 1 = 72, N 2 = 102) responded to check lists which contained both negative and positive performance specimens ( Whitlock, 1963) related to two of Herzberg's Ms and three Hs. These data were used to test three of King's (1970) formulations of Herzberg's theory dealing with the relative frequency of good and bad experiences engendered by Ms and Hs (Theories I through III). A set of hypotheses dealing with levels of satisfaction and dissatisfaction derived from Ms and Hs were also tested. The results of both studies failed to support Herzberg's two-factor theory. Rather, the results appeared to substantiate the contention of Graen (1966) and others about the greater potential for satisfaction associated with intrinsic work factors.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.