Abstract

Machine learning is a powerful tool for data classification and has been used to classify movement data recorded by wearable inertial sensors in general living and sports. Inertial sensors can provide valuable biofeedback in combat sports such as boxing; however, the use of such technology has not had a global uptake. If simple inertial sensor configurations can be used to automatically classify strike type, then cumbersome tasks such as video labelling can be bypassed and the foundation for automated workload monitoring of combat sport athletes is set. This investigation evaluates the classification performance of six different supervised machine learning models (tuned and untuned) when using two simple inertial sensor configurations (configuration 1—inertial sensor worn on both wrists; configuration 2—inertial sensor worn on both wrists and third thoracic vertebrae [T3]). When trained on one athlete, strike prediction accuracy was good using both configurations (sensor configuration 1 mean overall accuracy: 0.90 ± 0.12; sensor configuration 2 mean overall accuracy: 0.87 ± 0.09). There was no significant statistical difference in prediction accuracy between both configurations and tuned and untuned models (p > 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant statistical difference in computational training time for tuned and untuned models (p > 0.05). For sensor configuration 1, a support vector machine (SVM) model with a Gaussian rbf kernel performed the best (accuracy = 0.96), for sensor configuration 2, a multi-layered perceptron neural network (MLP-NN) model performed the best (accuracy = 0.98). Wearable inertial sensors can be used to accurately classify strike-type in boxing pad work, this means that cumbersome tasks such as video and notational analysis can be bypassed. Additionally, automated workload and performance monitoring of athletes throughout training camp is possible. Future investigations will evaluate the performance of this algorithm on a greater sample size and test the influence of impact window-size on prediction accuracy. Additionally, supervised machine learning models should be trained on data collected during sparring to see if high accuracy holds in a competition setting. This can help move closer towards automatic scoring in boxing.

Highlights

  • Wearable inertial sensors are fast becoming a validated technology to provide data for athlete performance analysis in a range of sports [1]

  • The authors postulate that when more complex pad work combinations are being executed the challenge of differentiating punch type from data extracted from the T3 sensor becomes more complex; when using glove inertial sensors, it remains similar

  • This paper evaluates the classification performance using two different sensor configurations, one which demonstrates smart boxing gloves and another which is beneficial as many professional sporting organisations already use a global positioning system (GPS)/inertial sensor unit located at the T3

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wearable inertial sensors are fast becoming a validated technology to provide data for athlete performance analysis in a range of sports [1]. An abundance of scientific literature and commercialized technology have monitoring. An abundance of scientific literature and commercialized technology have used signals used signals obtained by wearable sensors identify activity type and intensity in sport and obtained by wearable inertial inertial sensors to identifytoactivity type and intensity in sport and general general living living [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. An abundance of scientific literature and commercialized technology have used signals used signals obtained by wearable sensors identify activity type and intensity in sport and obtained by wearable inertial inertial sensors to identifytoactivity type and intensity in sport and general general living living [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call