Abstract

Within-subjects analyses were used to evaluate the ability of a valence model of motivation to predict the post high school plans of 493 students. Valence models including only existence, relatedness, and growth outcomes ( C.P. Alderfer, Existence, relatedness, and growth: Human needs in organizational settings. New York: The Free Press, 1972 ) were compared with a valence model including all three types of outcomes. In addition, predictions based on Σ VI model and predictions based only on instrumentalities were compared. The use of growth outcomes alone resulted in the best prediction of post high school plans, and multiplying instrumentalities by valences yielded approximately the same predictions as did the use of instrumentalities alone. In addition, there was evidence that predictions based on the valence model were less accurate than predictions which included measures of academic achievement and parental income as well as valences.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.