Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate online depression self-management (SM) resources based on their readability, suitability, and quality to determine their appropriateness for use by patients. MethodsA Google search using patients’ most frequently searched terms was conducted. Resources were evaluated using readability indices, the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM), and the DISCERN tool. The number of SM skills and other contributing factors (e.g., resource format) were also evaluated. ResultsThe mean readability score across the sample was grade 10 (SD 1.5, range 8–14) and 22.2% of resources (n = 6) met the criteria for superior suitability. The mean sample scores were 58.8% (SD 11.6, range 36%–81%) for the DISCERN and 4.4 for SM skills (SD 1.6, range 2–8). SAM and DISCERN scores were found to be significantly correlated (Pearson correlation-coefficient 0.70). A cluster analysis of SAM and DISCERN scores suggested two groups that were significantly different (t-test, P < 0.001): 8 resources in a “high quality” cluster and 19 resources in a “medium/low” quality cluster. ConclusionEight publicly available online resources scored highly. However, the readability of all the resources evaluated exceeded recommended levels. Practice implicationsResources that are accessible to people with lower literacy levels and increased user-friendliness are needed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
