Abstract

AbstractThe Community Earth System Model 2 (CESM2) is the latest Earth System Model developed by the National Center for Atmospheric Research in collaboration with the university community and is significantly advanced in most components compared to its predecessor (CESM1). Here, CESM2's representation of the large‐scale atmospheric circulation and its variability is assessed. Further context is providedthrough comparison to the CESM1 large ensemble and other models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5 and CMIP6). This includes an assessment of the representation of jet streams and storm tracks, stationary waves, the global divergent circulation, the annular modes, the North Atlantic Oscillation, and blocking. Compared to CESM1, CESM2 is substantially improved in the representation of the storm tracks, Northern Hemisphere (NH) stationary waves, NH winter blocking and the global divergent circulation. It ranks within the top 10% of CMIP class models in many of these features. Some features of the Southern Hemisphere (SH) circulation have degraded, such as the SH jet strength, stationary waves, and blocking, although the SH jet stream is placed at approximately the correct location. This analysis also highlights systematic deficiencies in these features across the new CMIP6 archive, such as the continued tendency for the SH jet stream to be placed too far equatorward, the North Atlantic westerlies to be too strong over Europe, the storm tracks as measured by low‐level meridional wind variance to be too weak and a lack of blocking in the North Atlantic sector.

Highlights

  • The Community Earth System Model, Version 2 (CESM2), is the second generation Earth System Model developed by the U.S.'s National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), in collaboration with university researchers (Hurrell et al, 2013)

  • We provide context by assessing changes compared to its predecessor (CESM1) and by placing it within the wider distribution of Earth System Models as represented by those participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phases 5 and 6

  • For each metric we show the minimum to maximum range of that metric from the 40 LENS members, giving an indication of the range of values that can arise due to internal variability within CESM1

Read more

Summary

, Key Points:

CESM2 is compared to CESM1 and other CMIP5 and CMIP6 models and ranks highly in many regards. Jets, storm tracks, stationary waves, divergent circulation, NAM, SAM, NAO, and blocking are assessed. CESM2 has improvements in storm tracks and NH winter circulation but degradations in SH circulation. B., Hannay, C., Gettelman, A., Garcia, R. An evaluation of the large‐scale atmospheric circulation and its variability in CESM2 and other. Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA, 2Atmospheric. Chemistry Observations and Modelling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA

Introduction
Model Simulations and Observation‐Based Data Sets
Summary of Simulations Used
Observation‐Based Data Sets
Normalized Mean Square Error Metric
Assessment of Uncertainty due to Internal Variability
Jet Streams and Storm Tracks
Stationary Waves
The Global Divergent Circulation
Extratropical Variability
The SAM
The NAM
The NAO
Blocking
Φo ðzgÞdΦ
Summary
Findings
Data Availability Statement
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.