Abstract
The ensemble averaged impedance cardiogram was evaluated during rest and during vocal mental arithmetic stress in samples of female (n = 17) and male (n = 40) undergraduates. Measures of myocardial performance determined from ensemble averaged signals were compared to those determined by simple beat-to-beat averaging over 60-s and 20-s sampling intervals. In addition, the influence of cardiac interval variability on dZ/dt amplitude measures was assessed. As expected, measures derived by the two averaging techniques corresponded closely, with correlations ranging from r = 0.882 to r = 1.000 for the 60-s sampling intervals, and from r = 0.726 to r = 1.000 for the 20-s sampling intervals. Inverse relationships of comparable magnitude were found between cardiac interval variability and dZ/dt amplitude measures determined by both averaging techniques, suggesting that these relationships did not result simply from artifacts introduced by the ensemble averaging technique. The results support the validity of ensemble averaging as a method for deriving impedance cardiographic measures of myocardial performance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
