Abstract

A randomized control trail study has been designed and carried out during the period of July 2014 to October 2016 (27 months) in the Department of Paediatric Surgery, Rajshahi Medical College, Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Twenty Six (26) neonates with myelomeningocele were taken as sample volume. This study was under taken to evaluate the effectiveness of simultaneous ventriculo-peritoneal shunt placement and the sequential shunting. These patients were randomly selected for this study and divided in to two groups. Thirteen patients were undergone repair of myelomeningocele with simultaneous insertion of vetriculo-pritoneal shunt and another 13 patients were undergone only myelomeningocele repair, at first stage. Twelve (12) patients were developed hydrocephalus later that subsequently needed ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement on an average after 31 days. Simultaneous surgery had the advantage of exposing the patients to one rather than two operations. Duration of hospital stay has reduced seven days, though operation time has increased 44 minutes that has not affected the outcome. No difference did exist between two groups but those were shunted simultaneously appeared to enjoy clear benefit. There was significant difference of wound complications like wound breakdown and wound infection between two groups, but wound leakage exclusively occured seven patients in sequentially shunted patients. Shunt related complications were remained same in both groups. There was gross deviation of preoperative OFC (+5.15%) in sequentially shunted patients, which was improved after shunt placement (+2.04%). But, there was significant (P<0.001) difference of OFC between two groups on follow up. Ventricular diameter was rapidly increased (42.65 mm) after repair of myelomeningocele in sequential shunted patients that was reduced after shunt placement but remained at least 7 mm larger than the simultaneous shunted patients. This has also affected the expansion of cortical thickness of brain in sequentially shunted patients which was 3mm less than simultaneously shunted patients. This difference significantly (P<0.01) differ the intelligence quotient. Simultaneously shunted patients also enjoying better health (67%) than sequentially shunted (56%) patients. Simultaneous shunting avoided prolong periods of progressive hydrocephalus compared with those sequentially shunted, thereby averting further cerebral injury and improving intelligence and physical growth.

Highlights

  • Neural tube defect or spinal dysraphism is one of the common congenital malformation [1]

  • Placement and the Sequential Shunting- in Neonatal Myelomeningocele neural tube defect. 5% of all neural tube resulting from spina bifida oculta usually not associated with neurological abnormalities

  • This randomized control trail study has been designed and carried out during the period of July 2014 to October 2016 (27 months) in the Department of Paediatric Surgery, Rajshahi Medical College, Rajshahi, Bangladesh. 26 patients were taken as sample volume

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neural tube defect or spinal dysraphism is one of the common congenital malformation [1]. Though exact cause is unknown, some known factors such as maternal alcohol, maternal diabetics, X-ray irradiation, amniotic band disruption and some maternal nutritional deprivation increase the incidence Some suspected factors such as drugs like carbamazepine, valproate, maternal hyperthermia; exposer to rubella may be responsible for the neural tube defect [8, 9]. That result subsequent hydrocephalus in 65 to 85% within 6 months and cause breakdown of repair and CSF leakage [16] To prevent this complication some surgeons begins to do myelomeningocele repair and introduction of VP shunt at least 3 days after the initial repair [17]. This gives better result but increase hospital stays and imposes an additional operative trauma within a short interval. Report from abroad on successful treatment of myelomeningocele, prompted to undertake this study to compare the outcome of simultaneous shunt placement and repair of myelomeningocele versus repair only and subsequent shunt placement, if needed

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call