Abstract
AbstractThe Iceland and Greenland Seas are a crucial region for the climate system, being the headwaters of the lower limb of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Investigating the atmosphere–ocean–ice processes in this region often necessitates the use of meteorological reanalyses—a representation of the atmospheric state based on the assimilation of observations into a numerical weather prediction system. Knowing the quality of reanalysis products is vital for their proper use. Here we evaluate the surface‐layer meteorology and surface turbulent fluxes in winter and spring for the latest reanalysis from the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts, i.e., ERA5. In situ observations from a meteorological buoy, a research vessel, and a research aircraft during the Iceland–Greenland Seas Project provide unparalleled coverage of this climatically important region. The observations are independent of ERA5. They allow a comprehensive evaluation of the surface meteorology and fluxes of these subpolar seas and, for the first time, a specific focus on the marginal ice zone. Over the ice‐free ocean, ERA5 generally compares well to the observations of surface‐layer meteorology and turbulent fluxes. However, over the marginal ice zone, the correspondence is noticeably less accurate: for example, the root‐mean‐square errors are significantly higher for surface temperature, wind speed, and surface sensible heat flux. The primary reason for the difference in reanalysis quality is an overly smooth sea‐ice distribution in the surface boundary conditions used in ERA5. Particularly over the marginal ice zone, unrepresented variability and uncertainties in how to parameterize surface exchange compromise the quality of the reanalyses. A parallel evaluation of higher‐resolution forecast fields from the Met Office's Unified Model corroborates these findings.
Highlights
The subpolar seas of the North Atlantic are critically important for the global climate system as they are the source of the dense waters of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC)
Ocean circulation paradigms have shifted over the years: from when it was thought that the Iceland and Greenland Seas were the primary source of dense water via open ocean convection (e.g., Swift and Aagaard, 1981), to a view that consistent ocean cooling and densification around the rim current of the Nordic Seas was dominant (e.g., Mauritzen, 1996), to a shift back to the importance of the Iceland and Greenland Seas due to the discovery of the North Icelandic Jet (Jónsson and Valdimarsson, 2004; Våge et al, 2011; 2013; Semper et al, 2019) and of areas of dense water in the northwest Iceland and western Greenland Seas (Våge et al, 2018)
Combining the comparisons from the three observing platforms demonstrates that ERA5 is significantly less accurate over the marginal ice zone (MIZ) than over water for both the surface-layer meteorology and surface turbulent fluxes. This is clearly demonstrated by contrasting the RMSE over water/over the MIZ:
Summary
The subpolar seas of the North Atlantic are critically important for the global climate system as they are the source of the dense waters of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). This is important for the polar and subpolar regions, where NWP systems have numerous well-known weaknesses, for example, in the representation of stable boundary layers, mixed-phased clouds, sea-ice characteristics, and surface exchange over heterogeneous surfaces or in the use of observations (Bourassa et al, 2013; Vihma et al, 2014; Jung et al, 2016; Lawrence et al, 2019) All of these processes will impact the quality of surface-layer meteorological variables and surface fluxes, raising questions as to how accurate these fields will be in reanalyses, analyses, and forecasts.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
