Abstract
Abstract : An analysis was conducted to determine the accuracies and limitations of three statistical methods used to predict engine-face maximum time-variant total pressure distortion. The statistical methods have all been proposed as low-cost alternatives to the time-consuming and costly deterministic method generally used for reducing engine-face time-variant total pressure data. The statistical methods are evaluated by comparing their predicted distortion values and patterns to those measured with the deterministic method. Data comparisons from tests of four different inlet models, covering a wide range of Mach numbers, mass flow ratios, model attitudes, and distortion factors, were used during the analysis. The results show good agreement between the measured and predicted values for all three statistical methods. The distortion pattern predictions, however, were inadequate at conditions with high total pressure fluctuation (turbulence). It is recommended that improvements continue to be made in the statistical methods, particularly adjustments for high-turbulence conditions, and that the Melick method be used as an on-line distortion analysis tool for inlet performance tests.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.