An evaluation of some pertinent parameters that influence the dosimetric performance of synthetic diamond detectors

Abstract

Although the near-tissue equivalence of diamond allows the direct measurement of dose for clinical applications without the need for energy-corrections, it is often cited that diamond detectors require pre-irradiation, a procedure necessary to stabilize the response or sensitivity of a diamond detector before dose measurements. In addition it has been pointed out that the relative dose measured with a diamond detector requires dose rate dependence correction and that the angular dependence of a detector could be due to its mechanical design or to the intrinsic angular sensitivity of the detection process. While the cause of instability of response has not been meticulously investigated, the issue of dose rate dependence correction is uncertain as some studies ignored it but reported good results. The aims of this study were therefore to investigate, in particular (1) the major cause of the unstable response of diamond detectors requiring pre-irradiation; (2) the influence of dose rate dependence correction in relative dose measurements; and (3) the angular dependence of the diamond detectors. The study was conducted with low-energy X-rays and electron therapy beams on HPHT and CVD synthesized diamonds. Ionization chambers were used for comparative measurements. Through systematic investigations, the major cause of the unstable response of diamond detectors requiring the recommended pre-irradiation step was isolated and attributed to the presence and effects of ambient light. The variation in detector’s response between measurements in light and dark conditions could be as high as 63% for a CVD diamond. Dose rate dependence parameters (Δ values) of 0.950 and 1.035 were found for the HPHT and CVD diamond detectors, respectively. Without corrections based on dose rate dependence, the relative differences between depth-doses measured with the diamond detectors and a Markus chamber for exposures to 7 and 14MeV electron beams were within 2.5%. A dose rate dependence correction using the Δ values obtained seemed to worsen the performance of the HPHT sample (up to about 3.3%) but it had a marginal effect on the performance of the CVD sample. In addition, the angular response of the CVD diamond detector was shown to be comparable with that of a cylindrical chamber. This study concludes that once the responses of the diamond detectors have been stabilised and they are properly shielded from ambient light, pre-irradiation prior to each measurement is not required. Also, the relative dose measured with the diamond detectors do not require dose rate dependence corrections as the required correction is only marginal and could have no dosimetric significance.