An evaluation of favorite kind of day drawings from physically maltreated and non-maltreated children

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to replicate Manning’s (1987) research that looked at “Favorite Kind of Day” drawings produced by children who had been maltreated in comparison to non-maltreated children. The hypothesis of the study was that the maltreated children’s drawings would consistently differ from drawings produced by non-maltreated children over time. Method: Eighteen children aged between 4 and 8 years old were individually asked to draw their “Favorite Kind of Day” (FKD). The drawings from six physically maltreated participants were compared to 12 non-maltreated children matched for age, sex, socio-economic and educational background. The drawings were compared on three criteria: inclement weather, size, and movement of weather. Results: The results showed that over a period of 18 months, maltreated and non-maltreated children consistently drew similar drawings, and no significant differences were found between the groups. Conclusions: The implications of these findings cannot be underestimated, as clinical use of the FKD technique suggested by Manning’s findings, for English children at least, would lead to incorrect identification of children as having suffered maltreatment when they may in fact not have.