An evaluation of combined strategies for improving the performance of molecular docking.

Abstract

Molecular docking is a fast and efficient computational method for the prediction of the binding mode and binding affinity between a ligand and a target protein at the atomic level. However, the performance of current docking programs is less than satisfactory. Herein, with a focus on free programs and scoring functions, the performances of LeDock and three standalone scoring functions were tested by 195 high-quality protein-ligand complexes. Results showed that the success rate for the best pose of the free available docking program LeDock achieved 89.20%, indicative of a strong sampling power. Based on the poses generated by LeDock, a comparative evaluation on other three non-commercial scoring functions, including DSX (DrugScore X), PoseScore and X-score was performed. Among all the evaluated scoring functions, DSX and X-score exhibited the best scoring power and ranking power, respectively. The performances of LeDock, DSX and X-score were similar in docking power test, which was much better than the PoseScore. Accordingly, it was suggested that the combination of pose sampling by LeDock with rescoring by DSX or X-score could improve the prediction accuracy of molecular docking and applied in the lead discovery.